feat: update to zig-0.14 #75
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks! I was looking to do this myself some day, but you beat me to it 🙂 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update to Zig 0.14.
Most changes involve straightforward renames of standard library types.
The only nontrivial change is regarding
pop. Based on my understanding:pop()on an empty collection would panic.popOrNull()has been renamed topop(), which now returns an optional value. Usingpop().?will also panic if the value is null.Therefore, migrating from
pop()in 0.13 topop().?in 0.14 should preserve the original behavior. However, I'm not very knowledgable about Zig so I recommend verifying this to ensure accuracy.