Skip to content

Conversation

nietras
Copy link
Owner

@nietras nietras commented Jan 27, 2025

Fix intricate issue possible if Peek not implemented or returning -1 even if more data available and better support full async. No known real world issues.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.66%. Comparing base (9eb625c) to head (bca1cbc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #243   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.65%   99.66%           
=======================================
  Files          54       54           
  Lines        4087     4119   +32     
  Branches      458      464    +6     
=======================================
+ Hits         4073     4105   +32     
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        3        3           
Flag Coverage Δ
Debug 99.46% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
Release 99.82% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
macos-latest 93.12% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️
ubuntu-latest 99.61% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
windows-latest 99.61% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nietras nietras merged commit 2a71b43 into main Jan 28, 2025
34 checks passed
@nietras nietras deleted the sepreader-no-peek branch January 28, 2025 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant