Skip to content

Conversation

a13xb
Copy link
Contributor

@a13xb a13xb commented Mar 1, 2014

HAVE_STACK_LIMIT definition was commented out in the original Mercurial repo:
https://code.google.com/p/vim/source/detail?r=7e70fc748752

...and then completely removed:
https://code.google.com/p/vim/source/detail?r=6768ebd0bc04

But the code depending on it was left in.

HAVE_STACK_LIMIT definition was commented out in rev 180 of the original
Mercurial repo, and then completely removed in rev 2520, but the code
depending on it was left in.
@justinmk
Copy link
Member

justinmk commented Mar 1, 2014

Nice investigating. This is an example in favor of retaining the existing history from the mercurial repo...

@a13xb a13xb mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2014
@a13xb a13xb closed this Mar 3, 2014
@a13xb a13xb deleted the remove-have-stack-limit branch March 3, 2014 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants