fix(plugins): correct error handling in plugin initialization #4311
Conversation
Updated the error handling logic in the plugin lifecycle manager to accurately record the success of the OnInit method. The change ensures that the metrics reflect whether the initialization was successful, improving the reliability of plugin metrics tracking. Additionally, removed the unused errorMapper interface from base_capability.go to clean up the codebase. Signed-off-by: Deluan <deluan@navidrome.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR corrects the inverted success/failure flag when recording plugin initialization metrics and cleans up an unused errorMapper interface and its related code.
- Fixed inverted boolean in
RecordPluginRequestcall forOnInit - Removed dead
errorMapperinterface and mapping logic
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| plugins/plugin_lifecycle_manager.go | Flip err != nil to err == nil for correct metric |
| plugins/base_capability.go | Remove unused errorMapper interface and mapping |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @deluan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a critical bug in plugin initialization error handling, ensuring that success and failure metrics are accurately reported. Additionally, it cleans up the codebase by removing an obsolete and unused error mapping interface, contributing to better maintainability.
Highlights
- Plugin Metrics Correction: Corrected an inverted boolean logic in
plugins/plugin_lifecycle_manager.goto accurately record success/failure metrics for plugin initialization. Previously,err != nilwas incorrectly used for the success metric, which has now been changed toerr == nil. - Code Cleanup: Removed the unused
errorMapperinterface and its associated usage fromplugins/base_capability.go. This interface and its implementation were no longer needed, simplifying the codebase.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a bug where plugin initialization metrics were inverted and removes unused code related to errorMapper. The changes are accurate and improve the codebase. I've added one medium-severity suggestion to improve the clarity of logging around plugin initialization failures, which should aid future debugging.
Description
This PR fixes a bug in plugin initialization error handling where the success/failure metric was inverted. The fix ensures that plugin initialization metrics correctly reflect the actual success or failure status of the operation.
Additionally, removes the unused
errorMapperinterface and related code that was no longer needed.Related Issues
Type of Change
Checklist
Please review and check all that apply:
How to Test
Screenshots / Demos (if applicable)