Skip to content

feat(subsonic): implement indexBasedQueue extension #4244

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kgarner7
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @kgarner7, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces support for the indexBasedQueue OpenSubsonic extension, enhancing play queue management by allowing the current track to be specified by an optional index. This involves significant changes to the data model, persistence layer, and API endpoints to accommodate the new optional index, along with a corresponding database migration.

Highlights

  • Subsonic Extension Implementation: I've implemented the indexBasedQueue OpenSubsonic extension, which allows clients to manage play queues using an index to specify the current track.
  • Optional Current Index: The Current field in the PlayQueue model and its associated persistence layer has been updated from an int to a pointer *int, making it optional (nullable) in the database and Go structures.
  • New API Endpoints: I've introduced two new Subsonic API endpoints: getPlayQueueByIndex and savePlayQueueByIndex, to facilitate the new index-based queue management functionality.
  • Database Migration: A new database migration is included to modify the playqueue table, specifically making the current column optional to align with the Go model changes.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request implements the indexBasedQueue extension for Subsonic, allowing the current track in a play queue to be optional and identified by its index. The changes span database migrations, model updates, persistence layer adjustments, and new API endpoints, along with corresponding test updates.

My main review points focus on ensuring the database migration is fully reversible by implementing a proper Down script, and improving an error message in one of the new API handlers for better clarity to API consumers. Addressing these points will enhance the robustness and maintainability of this feature.

Comment on lines +9 to +12
-- +goose Down
-- +goose StatementBegin
SELECT 'down SQL query';
-- +goose StatementEnd
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The Down migration currently contains a placeholder and does not revert the schema changes made in the Up migration. It should restore the current column to its previous state. Implement the Down migration to accurately reverse the Up operations.

-- +goose Down
-- +goose StatementBegin
-- Assuming the previous state was 'current INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0'
-- Adjust if the original constraints were different.
ALTER TABLE playqueue ADD COLUMN current_old INTEGER NOT NULL DEFAULT 0;
UPDATE playqueue SET current_old = COALESCE(current, 0);
ALTER TABLE playqueue DROP COLUMN current;
ALTER TABLE playqueue RENAME COLUMN current_old TO current;
-- +goose StatementEnd

index = &currentIndex

if currentIndex < 0 || currentIndex >= len(items) {
return nil, newError(responses.ErrorMissingParameter, "missing parameter index, err: %s", err)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The error message used when currentIndex is out of bounds could be more precise. Consider using responses.ErrorDataNotFound or a more generic error indicating an invalid value, along with a clearer message.

Suggested change
return nil, newError(responses.ErrorMissingParameter, "missing parameter index, err: %s", err)
return nil, newError(responses.ErrorDataNotFound, "currentIndex out of bounds")

Comment on lines +87 to 92
if pq.Current != nil {
current := *pq.Current
if current >= 0 && current < len(pq.Items) {
currentID = pq.Items[current].ID
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This block handles the case where pq.Current is nil, preventing a panic when dereferencing a nil pointer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant