forked from domob1812/namecoin-core
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 149
Open
Labels
metaNot so much an actual coding issue, but about making a decision or improving our process.Not so much an actual coding issue, but about making a decision or improving our process.
Milestone
Description
From #namecoin-meeting:
Mar 06 19:43:47 <Jeremy_Rand> Erkan_Yilmaz: Gitian has a nice signature system, so if you have the GPG pubkeys of the various developers, Gitian can automatically verify that the build is trustworthy and tell you who reproduced the hashes
Mar 06 19:44:17 <qpm> freenode:<Erkan_Yilmaz> I see
Mar 06 19:44:19 <Jeremy_Rand> Bitcoin has the GPG pubkeys of the Gitian signers in their repo; we should probably do so as well
Mar 06 19:45:07 <qpm> freenode:<cassiniNMC> ACK
Mar 06 19:46:02 <Jeremy_Rand> cassiniNMC: are you ACKing posting binaries when 1 dev has posted Gitian sigs, or are you ACKing putting GPG pubkeys of the devs in the GitHub repo?
Mar 06 19:46:27 <qpm> freenode:<cassiniNMC> both
Mar 06 19:46:29 <Jeremy_Rand> ok
Mar 06 19:46:54 <Jeremy_Rand> sounds good
Details are briefly mentioned at https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-core/blob/master/doc/release-process.md#verify-other-gitian-builders-signatures-to-your-own-optional .
The 4 Namecoin developers I'm aware of who use Gitian are me, @josephbisch, @jonasbits, and @midnightmagic . @ryancdotorg has also expressed interest in the past. Are you guys okay with adding your GPG pubkeys to the namecoin-core repo? (I guess midnight's is already there, since he does Gitian builds for Bitcoin.)
- master branch
- 0.12 branch
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
metaNot so much an actual coding issue, but about making a decision or improving our process.Not so much an actual coding issue, but about making a decision or improving our process.