-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
feat: support reasoning_content
#206
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @kwaa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request integrates support for AI model reasoning content across the text generation and streaming pipelines. The changes allow for the capture, processing, and real-time streaming of model reasoning, which can significantly improve the transparency and debuggability of AI-generated text.
Highlights
- New Feature: Reasoning Content Support: This pull request introduces comprehensive support for a new
reasoning_content
field, enabling the system to handle and stream detailed reasoning information from AI models. - API and Type Definition Updates: Modified core interfaces such as
GenerateTextResult
(addingreasoningText
) andAssistantMessageResponse
(addingreasoning_content
) to accommodate the new data field. - Streaming Functionality Extension: Enhanced the
streamText
functionality to process and emitreasoning-delta
events for streamed reasoning content, requiring updates toStreamTextChunkResult
andStreamTextEvent
types.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds support for reasoning_content
across the generate-text
and stream-text
packages. The changes are consistent and introduce a new reasoningText
field in results and a reasoning-delta
event in streams. My review focuses on ensuring the new feature is well-tested and improving maintainability by addressing cognitive complexity.
closed #182