Add support for loop-contract historic values #3951
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tautschnig
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
|
Looks like you want to run |
qinheping
reviewed
Mar 20, 2025
|
Could we use Some documentation describing the transformation at a high level would help the review. |
carolynzech
reviewed
Mar 21, 2025
qinheping
reviewed
Apr 1, 2025
|
I am a bit confused about the semantics of |
…into loopmodify
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add support for
oldandprevto refers to historic values in loop contracts whereold(expr)refers to the value of the expr before the loop.prev(expr)refers to the value of the expr at the previous iteration.Resolves #3697
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 and MIT licenses.