Skip to content

Conversation

thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

The test considered Foo/bar to be an invalid name, with the assumption that it was [docker.io]/Foo/bar. However, this was incorrect, and the test passed because the reference parsing had a bug; if the first element (Foo) is not lowercase (so not a valid namespace / "path element"), then it should be considered a domain (as uppercase domain names are valid).

The reference parser did not account for this, and running the test with a version of the parser with a fix caused the test to fail:

=== Failed
=== FAIL: client TestImageTagInvalidSourceImageName/invalidRepo/FOO/bar (0.00s)
    image_tag_test.go:54: assertion failed: expected error to contain "not a valid repository/tag", got "Error response from daemon: client should not have made an API call"
        Error response from daemon: client should not have made an API call

=== FAIL: client TestImageTagInvalidSourceImageName (0.00s)

This patch removes the faulty test-case.

- A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)

The test considered `Foo/bar` to be an invalid name, with the assumption
that it was `[docker.io]/Foo/bar`. However, this was incorrect, and the
test passed because the reference parsing had a bug; if the first element
(`Foo`) is not lowercase (so not a valid namespace /  "path element"), then
it *should* be considered a domain (as uppercase domain names are valid).

The reference parser did not account for this, and running the test with
a version of the parser with a fix caused the test to fail:

    === Failed
    === FAIL: client TestImageTagInvalidSourceImageName/invalidRepo/FOO/bar (0.00s)
        image_tag_test.go:54: assertion failed: expected error to contain "not a valid repository/tag", got "Error response from daemon: client should not have made an API call"
            Error response from daemon: client should not have made an API call

    === FAIL: client TestImageTagInvalidSourceImageName (0.00s)

This patch removes the faulty test-case.

Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants