Skip to content

RELEASE: PCP AI Improvements #3966

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2025
Merged

RELEASE: PCP AI Improvements #3966

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 5, 2025

Conversation

Orta21
Copy link
Member

@Orta21 Orta21 commented Jun 5, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Issues:

Description

Testing

Check each PR.

Release Plan

  • ⚠️ Points to master
  • Merge this

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Practitioner details now include both name and qualification, providing more comprehensive information wherever practitioner references appear.

  • Documentation

    • Updated instructions for identifying Primary Care Provider (PCP) visits, with clearer criteria and terminology.
    • Removed requirements to list medications with recent fill dates from the output format.

thomasyopes and others added 3 commits June 5, 2025 17:06
@thomasyopes
Merge pull request #3963 from metriport/master
4b0e00f 
BACKMERGE Master
@Orta21
build: patch summary
4e72379 
Part of eng-465

Signed-off-by: Jorge Orta <36802074+Orta21@users.noreply.github.com>
@Orta21
Merge pull request #3965 from metriport/cs-465-update-ai-summary
88ff31f 
build: pcp summary updates
@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 5, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The updates expand the extraction and formatting of practitioner information by including both name and qualification fields in the output. Additionally, instructions for identifying primary care provider visits are refined to ensure only appropriate visits are considered, and requirements for listing medications are removed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/core/src/command/ai-brief/filter.ts Modified practitioner reference handling to combine name and qualification fields when present for various resources.
packages/core/src/command/ai-brief/pcp-visit-prompt.ts Updated PCP visit identification instructions, tightened criteria, clarified conditions, and removed medication lists.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Resource
    participant replaceReferencesWithData
    participant Practitioner

    Resource->>replaceReferencesWithData: Provide resource with performer/actor reference
    replaceReferencesWithData->>Practitioner: Fetch practitioner details
    Practitioner-->>replaceReferencesWithData: Return name and qualification
    replaceReferencesWithData->>replaceReferencesWithData: Combine name and qualification (if present)
    replaceReferencesWithData-->>Resource: Return formatted practitioner string
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • build: pcp summary updates #3965: Modifies the same function in filter.ts to include practitioner qualifications alongside names when replacing references, making the changes directly related.

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm error code ERR_SSL_WRONG_VERSION_NUMBER
npm error errno ERR_SSL_WRONG_VERSION_NUMBER
npm error request to https://10.0.0.28:4873/punycode/-/punycode-2.3.1.tgz failed, reason: C0DC89ED587F0000:error:0A00010B:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:wrong version number:../deps/openssl/openssl/ssl/record/ssl3_record.c:354:
npm error
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-06-05T23_42_23_015Z-debug-0.log

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38fbac7 and 88ff31f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/core/src/command/ai-brief/filter.ts (2 hunks)
  • packages/core/src/command/ai-brief/pcp-visit-prompt.ts (3 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Orta21 Orta21 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit efac9a1 Jun 5, 2025
63 of 64 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lucasdellabella lucasdellabella lucasdellabella approved these changes

@Goncharo Goncharo Awaiting requested review from Goncharo Goncharo is a code owner

@leite08 leite08 Awaiting requested review from leite08 leite08 is a code owner

@RamilGaripov RamilGaripov Awaiting requested review from RamilGaripov RamilGaripov is a code owner

@thomasyopes thomasyopes Awaiting requested review from thomasyopes thomasyopes is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@Orta21 @lucasdellabella @thomasyopes