Skip to content

Conversation

n2h9
Copy link
Contributor

@n2h9 n2h9 commented Jul 26, 2025

Description

Current version of GetEndpointForPort returns external endpoint which is :, which is not accessible within the meshery pod.

The correct approach is to use meshery-broker service cluster ip, which is available from endpoint.Internal

here are screenshots with working buttons:

image image image

I searched, looks like this connectivity api is the only place of usage, so we can update in meshkit.

Signed commits

  • Yes, I signed my commits.

…t machine) in GetEndpointForPort

Signed-off-by: Nikita B <n2h9z4@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @n2h9, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical internal connectivity issue within the Meshery environment. By modifying the GetEndpointForPort function, it ensures that internal components correctly retrieve and utilize the Meshery broker's cluster IP, rather than an inaccessible external address. This change is fundamental for enabling seamless communication between services deployed within the Meshery pod.

Highlights

  • Endpoint Resolution Fix: The GetEndpointForPort function has been updated to return the internal cluster IP (endpoint.Internal) of the Meshery broker service. Previously, it was returning the external endpoint (endpoint.External), which was inaccessible from within the Meshery pod.
  • Internal Connectivity Improvement: This change directly addresses a connectivity issue, ensuring that services running inside the Meshery pod can correctly access the Meshery broker via its internal cluster IP, enabling proper communication and functionality.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The PR changes the endpoint retrieval to use the internal cluster IP for in-pod communication, which fixes the described connectivity issue. The review includes a suggestion to make the implementation more robust by adding a check for a valid internal endpoint address to prevent silent failures and improve debuggability.

n2h9 and others added 2 commits July 26, 2025 22:38
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: n2h9 <13541181+n2h9@users.noreply.github.com>
…t machine) in GetEndpointForPort: add custom error ErrGetControllerEndpointForPortCode

Signed-off-by: Nikita B <n2h9z4@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@leecalcote leecalcote left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good to go 💥

@leecalcote leecalcote merged commit f53479e into meshery:master Jul 26, 2025
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants