Skip to content

feat(JSON): operators possible in JSON strings #217

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2022
Merged

feat(JSON): operators possible in JSON strings #217

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 17, 2022

Conversation

maxatome
Copy link
Owner

doc and examples are missing, but tests are OK

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 31, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.001%) to 99.862% when pulling 75f91df on json-in-json into a56657c on master.

@maxatome maxatome mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2022
Closed
@achenet
Copy link

achenet commented Sep 21, 2022

looks good to me :)

@maxatome maxatome force-pushed the json-in-json branch 7 times, most recently from b5e5d04 to 96e70bd Compare October 15, 2022 22:41
@maxatome
Copy link
Owner Author

  • introduction of raw strings;
  • literal \n, \r & \t accepted in strings;
  • $^Operator(params...) is possible;
  • "$^Operator(params...)" is possible;
  • Operator (without parenthesis) is possible;
  • operator shortcuts reimplemented to not be handled specifically.

doc and examples done.

@maxatome maxatome force-pushed the json-in-json branch 2 times, most recently from 87f3016 to 11cdfd0 Compare October 15, 2022 22:48
@maxatome
feat(JSON): rework the JSON parsing
75f91df 
- introduction of raw strings;
- literal \n, \r & \t accepted in strings;
- $^Operator(params...) is possible;
- "$^Operator(params...)" is possible;
- Operator (without parenthesis) is possible;
- operator shortcuts reimplemented to not be handled specifically.

Closes #203.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Soulé <btik-git@scoubidou.com>
@maxatome maxatome merged commit 766775c into master Oct 17, 2022
@maxatome maxatome deleted the json-in-json branch October 17, 2022 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
1 more reviewer

@achenet achenet achenet approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@maxatome @coveralls @achenet