Please add bug fixes, new features, breaking changes and anything else you think is worthwhile mentioning to the master (unreleased) section of CHANGELOG.md. If no CHANGELOG update is needed add the following to the PR description: [x] No CHANGELOG update needed

Hello @mike-hunhoff, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, gemini-code-assist here to provide a summary of this pull request. This PR, titled "update binja core version", appears to be a straightforward update to the project's test suite. Based on the changes, the primary goal is to update the expected Binary Ninja core version in one of the tests, likely reflecting an upgrade in the supported or tested-against version of Binary Ninja from 4.2 to 5.0.

Highlights

• Binary Ninja Version Update: The core change in this PR is updating the expected Binary Ninja core version from 4.2 to 5.0 within the test_binja_version function in the Binary Ninja feature tests.

Changelog

• tests/test_binja_features.py
  • Updated the assertion in test_binja_version to expect Binary Ninja core version 5.0 instead of 4.2 (line 73).

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Version number climbs,
Tests now check the new release,
Code evolves again.

Code Review

This pull request updates the expected Binary Ninja core version in the test suite from 4.2 to 5.0. The code change itself is straightforward and updates a single assertion.

My main feedback concerns the pull request's metadata and process:

1. PR Description: The description currently uses the default template. It would be very helpful to add context regarding this version update. For example:
   • Why is the Binary Ninja core version being updated to 5.0?
   • What are the implications of this update (e.g., new features enabled, compatibility changes, bug fixes addressed)?
2. Checklist: The checklist items (No CHANGELOG update needed, No new tests needed, No documentation update needed) are currently unchecked. Please review these and check them as appropriate.
   • If this version update has user-facing impacts, new feature support, or breaking changes, a CHANGELOG entry might be necessary.
   • Similarly, if this version of Binary Ninja has different setup requirements or compatibility notes relevant to capa users, documentation might need an update.

Addressing these points will improve the clarity and completeness of the PR, making it easier to understand the change and its impact.

Summary of Findings

• PR Process: Context and Checklist Completion: The pull request description lacks specific details about the motivation and impact of the Binary Ninja version update. Additionally, the checklist items (Changelog, Tests, Documentation) are unchecked. It's important to provide this context and explicitly address the checklist items. If updates to the changelog or documentation are needed due to this version change, they should be made. If they are not needed, the corresponding boxes should be checked to confirm this. This is a medium severity concern for project maintainability, release communication, and overall PR quality. This was not added as a specific file review comment as it pertains to the PR's metadata rather than a specific code change in the diff.

Merge Readiness

The code change itself—updating the expected Binary Ninja version in a test—is simple and appears correct assuming version 5.0 is the intended and tested target.

However, before merging, I recommend that the author address the points raised in the general feedback and findings_summary:

1. Provide context in the PR description for the version update.
2. Complete the checklist, ensuring that considerations for changelog and documentation updates have been made.

Addressing these process-related items is important for maintaining clarity and ensuring all impacts of the dependency update are considered. While I am not authorized to approve pull requests, I recommend these changes be made to improve the PR's quality. Given the medium severity process concern, changes are requested.