-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 616
add lint for registry control set regex that is not complete #2643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add lint for registry control set regex that is not complete #2643
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @mike-hunhoff, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request introduces a new lint check to ensure that regular expressions used for matching registry control sets are complete. Specifically, it checks if the regex includes both ControlSet\d{3}
and CurrentControlSet
to cover both direct and indirect references. The goal is to prevent incomplete matches when searching for registry keys related to control sets.
Highlights
- New Lint Check: A new lint check,
FeatureRegexRegistryControlSetMatchIncomplete
, is added to detect incomplete regex patterns for registry control sets. - Regex Completeness: The lint check verifies that regex patterns include both
ControlSet\d{3}
andCurrentControlSet
to ensure comprehensive matching. - Integration: The new lint check is integrated into the existing linting process by adding it to the list of checks in
lint_meta
.
Changelog
- scripts/lint.py
- Added
FeatureRegexRegistryControlSetMatchIncomplete
lint class to check for incomplete registry control set regex patterns (lines 724-744). - Integrated the new lint check into the
lint_meta
function (line 1009).
- Added
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Did you know?
Regular expressions are used in many programming languages and tools, including Python, JavaScript, Perl, and grep. Each implementation may have slight variations in syntax and features.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add bug fixes, new features, breaking changes and anything else you think is worthwhile mentioning to the master (unreleased)
section of CHANGELOG.md. If no CHANGELOG update is needed add the following to the PR description: [x] No CHANGELOG update needed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a new lint check to ensure that registry control set regexes are complete. The new lint identifies incomplete regexes and recommends using a more comprehensive pattern. The changes look good overall, but I have a few suggestions to improve the code's clarity and efficiency.
Summary of Findings
- Redundant
return False
statement: Thereturn False
statement inside thecheck_features
method is redundant because it will never be reached due to thereturn True
statement within theif
block. Removing it will simplify the code and improve readability. - Inconsistent use of
in
operator: The code uses both"string" in pat
and"string" not in pat
to check for the presence of substrings. For consistency and readability, consider using thein
operator for both checks.
Merge Readiness
The pull request introduces a valuable lint check for registry control set regexes. While the changes are generally well-implemented, addressing the redundant return False
statement and ensuring consistent use of the in
operator would enhance the code's clarity and efficiency. I recommend addressing these points before merging. I am unable to directly approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
CHANGELOG updated or no update needed, thanks! 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice!
Checklist