Wildcard for excluding filesystems (TimeMachine) #106
Description
duf 0.6.0 from Homebrew
duf produces voluminous output on my system, due to a lot of filesystems mapped by TimeMachine → SMB share on my NAS:
╭───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ 17 local devices │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┬────────┬─────────┬────────┬───────────────────────────────┬───────┬───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ MOUNTED ON │ SIZE │ USED │ AVAIL │ USE% │ TYPE │ FILESYSTEM │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┼────────┼─────────┼────────┼───────────────────────────────┼───────┼───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ / │ 931.5G │ 14.0G │ 232.3G │ [....................] 1.5% │ apfs │ /dev/disk1s5s1 │
│ /System/Volumes/Data │ 931.5G │ 683.1G │ 232.3G │ [##############......] 73.3% │ apfs │ /dev/disk1s1 │
│ /System/Volumes/Preboot │ 931.5G │ 348.2M │ 232.3G │ [....................] 0.0% │ apfs │ /dev/disk1s2 │
│ /System/Volumes/Update │ 931.5G │ 1004.0K │ 232.3G │ [....................] 0.0% │ apfs │ /dev/disk1s6 │
│ /System/Volumes/VM │ 931.5G │ 1.0G │ 232.3G │ [....................] 0.1% │ apfs │ /dev/disk1s4 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 259.2G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 6.7% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-02-070031.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-02-070031.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 266.9G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 6.9% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-03-060550.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-03-060550.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 270.9G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-04-042746.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-04-042746.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 270.6G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-04-063743.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-04-063743.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 272.8G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-04-211925.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-04-211925.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 272.8G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-04-232354.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-04-232354.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 273.3G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-05-012747.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-05-012747.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/95A20C74-B2D8-4BF2-B753-966BA63 │ 3.8T │ 273.5G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ com.apple.TimeMachine.2021-02-05-054028.backup@/dev/d │
│ 23011/2021-02-05-054028.backup │ │ │ │ │ │ isk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/.timemachine/nas2._smb._tcp.local./D283BA05- │ 4.0T │ 274.2G │ 3.7T │ [#...................] 6.7% │ smbfs │ //luke@nas2._smb._tcp.local./TimeMachine │
│ 2364-4C54-B0D4-D0133C60A859/TimeMachine │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ /Volumes/Backups of mini │ 3.8T │ 273.4G │ 3.5T │ [#...................] 7.0% │ apfs │ /dev/disk4s1 │
│ /Volumes/Recovery │ 931.5G │ 585.3M │ 232.3G │ [....................] 0.1% │ apfs │ /dev/disk1s3 │
│ /Volumes/storage │ 10.0T │ 4.4T │ 5.6T │ [########............] 43.9% │ smbfs │ //luke@nas2._smb._tcp.local/storage │
╰───────────────────────────────────────────────────────┴────────┴─────────┴────────┴───────────────────────────────┴───────┴───────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
I tried various incarnations of -hide, -hide-fs, -only-fs etc but nothing I did worked to exclude those *.timemachine mounts. Is there any way to do this? The fs names are dynamic due to the snapshot nature of the system, so specifying them explicitly isn't really an option.