Skip to content

Conversation

jorgefilipecosta
Copy link
Member

Description

This file change part of #17085 was not supposed to be merged, it was just for testing purposes, but I missed to push the reverted change before merging that PR.
This PR just fixes the issue.

@jorgefilipecosta jorgefilipecosta added the [Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended label Dec 11, 2019
@jorgefilipecosta jorgefilipecosta merged commit b2ef0f5 into master Dec 11, 2019
@jorgefilipecosta jorgefilipecosta deleted the revert/revert-file-unintentionally-merged branch December 11, 2019 19:43
@youknowriad youknowriad added this to the Gutenberg 7.2 milestone Jan 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Type] Bug An existing feature does not function as intended
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants