Problem

Since the PR 'Use block naming for marking blocks as overridable in patterns' was merged, all a user has to do to mark a block within a pattern as overridable is to provide a block name—either using List View, or the input in the 'Advanced' inspector controls.

Currently there's no way to name a block for organizational purposes, and not have it be overridable, which is a problem.

Let's discuss potential solutions to this problem in the comments.