Skip to content

Conversation

jiangzhuti
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 96.586% when pulling 7c2c62a on jiangzhuti:jiangzhuti-patch-1 into c1ab707 on SRombauts:master.

@SRombauts SRombauts self-assigned this Aug 25, 2019
@SRombauts
Copy link
Owner

Hi!

Thanks for this, but can you explain the logic? I think we might actually want both sqlite3 and SQLiteCpp as dynamic libraries, depending on the use cases?

@jiangzhuti
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiangzhuti commented Aug 26, 2019

Hi!

Thanks for this, but can you explain the logic? I think we might actually want both sqlite3 and SQLiteCpp as dynamic libraries, depending on the use cases?

https://github.com/SRombauts/SQLiteCpp/blob/master/CMakeLists.txt#L192 VS https://github.com/SRombauts/SQLiteCpp/blob/master/sqlite3/CMakeLists.txt#L15

@SRombauts SRombauts merged commit 629497e into SRombauts:master Aug 26, 2019
@SRombauts
Copy link
Owner

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants