Skip to content

Confirm that CBDT/CBLC glyph actually works #8

@RoelN

Description

@RoelN

Edit: current situation in a nutshell:

CBDT spec proposal stated no glyf table should be present in CBDT/CBLC fonts. Current spec doesn't say anything about this. Fonts built on the proposal specs will fail in browsers with OTS, as the absence of a glyf table makes OTS reject them. In current FreeType implementations (Chrome on Android), these glyfless fonts work, and the color glyphs are shown.

For CBDT/CBLC fonts with a glyf table the glyph in the CBDT/CBLC table will be ignored, effectively always rendering the normal glyph, making it impossible to get the color glyph.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions