-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
examples: tests: port applications to gnrc_netif2 #7966
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
examples: tests: port applications to gnrc_netif2 #7966
Conversation
I do get lets of linker errors for missing symbols of netif (old version1) functions, is that to be expected? For instance when compiling |
Nope, they are all NDP related (look at the objects that cause those linker errors). They should be fixed in #7456. |
a3664c9
to
57ac108
Compare
Ok. I searched for all the "failed:" in Murdock's log now. Only remaining fails are in tests, that try to link in |
@bergzand can you have a look at this as well, please? |
Just started reviewing, give me a few minutes :) |
Sorry didn't mean to put you in a hurry, just wanted to make you aware of this PR :-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good, single remark.
tests/gnrc_ipv6_ext/main.c
Outdated
#include "net/gnrc/netif/hdr.h" | ||
#include "xtimer.h" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This include seems to be unecessary.
No worries :) |
Addressed. |
Ack, ready to squash. |
Test currently not working
e5c8793
to
7a833f8
Compare
Squashed |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ack
I've missed some applications in #7424. This takes care of most of them. I also know of
gnrc_ipv6_ext
but when I fix the compile issue the test itself fails. I have to look into that deeper and then will provide a fix for that as wellThis PR is part of the network layer remodelling effort:
