-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
gcoap_fileserver: rename to nanocoap_fileserver #20030
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
b3d70f9
to
3302492
Compare
3302492
to
ece2a13
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, tested on native manually (on my machine). However the tests/net/gcoap_fileserver/
still fails. @MrKevinWeiss commented to me that this is a known issue, as seen in the makefile:
# This integration test uncovers a bug somwehere in our stack, but there
# are currently no resources to debug it, so blacklist it to keep CI running
TEST_ON_CI_BLACKLIST += all
Huh, that should only be a very sporadic failure that only triggers when CI is under high load (?). |
ece2a13
to
c5ac574
Compare
I made a mistake when moving away from |
Yes! Works as intended. I think you should squash it. |
Contribution description
There isn't really anything GCoAP specific about the fileserver module, it can just as well be used with nanoCoAP. Move and rename it to reflect that.
Testing procedure
Both
examples/gcoap_fileserver
andexamples/nanocoap_server
keep serving files, but the latter one without pulling in a GCoAP dependency.Issues/PRs references