Skip to content

Conversation

aucampia
Copy link
Member

Summary of changes

This change makes RDFLib safer to use and change, as changes and usage can be validated using static analysers like mypy.

This change does not have a runtime impact, as can be seen from this.

Checklist

  • Checked that there aren't other open pull requests for
    the same change.
  • Checked that all tests and type checking passes.
  • Considered granting push permissions to the PR branch,
    so maintainers can fix minor issues and keep your PR up to date.

This change makes RDFLib safer to use and change, as changes and usage
can be validated using static analysers like mypy.

This change does not have a runtime impact.
@aucampia aucampia force-pushed the iwana-20230311T1536-type_collection branch from fa2d406 to 4240ae2 Compare March 11, 2023 14:47
@aucampia
Copy link
Member Author

I plan to merge this with no review as all validation passes, and the PR has no runtime changes.

@aucampia aucampia requested a review from a team March 11, 2023 14:51
@aucampia aucampia added review wanted This indicates that the PR is ready for review ready to merge The PR will be merged soon if no further feedback is provided. labels Mar 11, 2023
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage: 90.772% (+0.0009%) from 90.771% when pulling 4240ae2 on aucampia:iwana-20230311T1536-type_collection into 09b9069 on RDFLib:main.

@aucampia aucampia merged commit 9c70f51 into RDFLib:main Mar 12, 2023
@aucampia aucampia deleted the iwana-20230311T1536-type_collection branch April 9, 2023 15:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready to merge The PR will be merged soon if no further feedback is provided. review wanted This indicates that the PR is ready for review
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants