-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
renaming schemas #464
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
renaming schemas #464
Conversation
I'm not sure you added the renamed ones |
should be fixed now |
for consistency, can we have all the examples be like Right now the schemas are ok, but the examples are a bit disorganized in name. |
@ajavadia just for you, but what did i start :-) |
Should we change |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in backend_status_schema
change available
to operational
and update the example.
Thanks Ali |
* fixing the names * fixing the test for the schemas * renaming for ali * available -> operational
I would like to use full names
Schemas are still not used so no need to test.