Skip to content

Conversation

johnpetersa19
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Loganavter
Copy link
Owner

Loganavter commented May 14, 2025

I appreciate the cosmetic changes you suggested, as well as the cleaner, more technical code, but I still believe that keeping the star chart is more illustrative (and it’s located at the very bottom of the README), along with the full content of “My personal view on project” and “Development Story.” If you’d like to present everything more smoothly, you should refactor the existing information without losing the very insight they provide. In my view, this isn’t needless clutter but rather a gradual deepening into the project the further one scrolls.

@johnpetersa19
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for your feedback! I fully understand your point about preserving the "star chart" as an illustrative feature, as well as maintaining the complete content of both the “My personal view on project” and “Development Story” sections. I have made sure to keep these intact at the bottom of the README, just as you suggested.

In terms of the refactoring, I focused on presenting the technical details and features more clearly, reorganizing the sections to enhance readability and flow. However, I ensured that the depth and insight of the original content remain unchanged, as per your guidance.

I also took care to avoid clutter, maintaining a smooth flow of information, so that readers can gradually delve deeper into the project as they scroll through, just as you described. This should help keep the essential insights while improving the overall readability and presentation.

Please let me know if there’s anything else you would like me to adjust!

@Loganavter
Copy link
Owner

Loganavter commented May 20, 2025

Why did you remove the cosmetic solutions that you had previously proposed?

@johnpetersa19
Copy link
Contributor Author

I understand that you don't like it, I put it back the way it was before.

@Loganavter
Copy link
Owner

It seems there was a bit of a misunderstanding. What concerned me was that, in addition to the cosmetic changes, most of the content from the "Development Story" and "My Personal View" sections was removed. Also, there were things I previously mentioned, like the missing video and other details.

Aside from that, I actually think your cosmetic changes—like using emojis and making sections more readable outside of spoilers—set a nice tone for the project.

@johnpetersa19
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll leave it as it was before

@Loganavter
Copy link
Owner

Now it's satisfactory

@Loganavter Loganavter merged commit c38c2d7 into Loganavter:main May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants