Skip to content

Blocking AE control in D457 #13893

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

noacoohen
Copy link
Contributor

Tracked by RSDSO-19752

@noacoohen noacoohen requested review from Nir-Az and OhadMeir March 30, 2025 08:08
@@ -553,7 +553,8 @@ inline void draw_advanced_mode_controls(rs400::advanced_mode& advanced,
ImGui::TreePop();
}

if (ImGui::TreeNode("AE Control"))
//AE setpoint is blocked in D457
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is relevant to D457 or all MIPI devices? better to remove comment

@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ struct advanced_mode_control
};

inline void draw_advanced_mode_controls(rs400::advanced_mode& advanced,
advanced_mode_control& amc, bool& get_curr_advanced_controls, bool& was_set, std::string& error_message)
advanced_mode_control& amc, bool& get_curr_advanced_controls, bool& was_set, std::string& error_message, bool mipi_device=false)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it is better to pass device name or connection type and let this function implement the logic of checking it rather then pass a flag.

@noacoohen noacoohen force-pushed the block_ae_control_in_d457 branch from 64ec11e to f05ea38 Compare April 2, 2025 14:15
@Nir-Az Nir-Az merged commit 30bcdbb into IntelRealSense:development Apr 2, 2025
14 of 25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants