Skip to content

Conversation

amirmasoudabdol
Copy link
Contributor

  • Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
  • Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
  • Have you built your formula locally with brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
  • Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

This updates the nlohmann-json formula, and replaces its test with the test provided by @nlohmann. It defaults to build with CMake, and multiple headers.

@carlocab carlocab changed the title Updating the nlohmann-json Formula to 3.10.0 nlohmann-json 3.10.0 Aug 18, 2021
Copy link
Member

@carlocab carlocab left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @amirmasoudabdol.

For future reference, please adhere to the commit style guide referenced in the PR template when writing commit messages:

The preferred commit message format for simple version updates is foobar 7.3 and for fixes is foobar: fix flibble matrix..

}}
};
std::cout << j << std::endl;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's keep something like this in the test so we have output to check, please.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. I think I will bring back the old test. I realised that it's a better test for the Homebrew.

amirmasoudabdol added a commit to amirmasoudabdol/json that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2021
I've submitted a PR on [homebrew/core](Homebrew/homebrew-core#83479) that updates their Formula. After that one is set, we can merge this and let users use the default formula, and we don't have to maintain two separate Formulas.
@BrewTestBot
Copy link
Member

🤖 A scheduled task has triggered a merge.

@nlohmann
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks a lot for taking care of this!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the outdated PR was locked due to age label Sep 18, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
outdated PR was locked due to age
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants