Skip to content

Make CarbonPeriod serialization compatible with v2 #37

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 12, 2025
Merged

Make CarbonPeriod serialization compatible with v2 #37

merged 2 commits into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

kylekatarnls
Copy link
Contributor

Fix #36

@kylekatarnls kylekatarnls added this to the 3.10.0 milestone May 11, 2025
@kylekatarnls kylekatarnls added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels May 11, 2025
@kylekatarnls kylekatarnls force-pushed the fix/issue-36-period-serialization branch 2 times, most recently from 1e4bccf to 33b3d1f Compare May 11, 2025 20:42
@kylekatarnls kylekatarnls force-pushed the fix/issue-36-period-serialization branch from 33b3d1f to e751961 Compare May 12, 2025 06:56
@kylekatarnls kylekatarnls force-pushed the fix/issue-36-period-serialization branch from 5eadc4f to 5016445 Compare May 12, 2025 14:02
@kylekatarnls kylekatarnls merged commit 3309af8 into master May 12, 2025
54 checks passed
@kingjia90 kingjia90 mentioned this pull request Jun 12, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.10.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Serializing DatePeriod in v2 and unserializing in v3
1 participant
@kylekatarnls