Skip to content

Conversation

BrianHenryIE
Copy link
Owner

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @BrianHenryIE, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical issue where Strauss failed to recognize and utilize custom Composer configuration files, such as composer.json or composer.lock, when specified via the COMPOSER environment variable. The changes involve integrating Composer's Factory class to dynamically determine the correct paths for these files, ensuring that Strauss operates consistently with Composer's behavior. Additionally, the autoloader generation process has been refined for more accurate handling of development dependencies, and a dedicated integration test has been introduced to validate the fix.

Highlights

  • Custom Composer Configuration Support: Strauss now correctly identifies and uses custom composer.json and composer.lock files when the COMPOSER environment variable is set. This ensures that Strauss respects alternative Composer configurations, leading to accurate dependency resolution and configuration loading based on the specified file.
  • Autoloader Generation Refinement: The autoloader generation logic has been updated to more accurately determine devMode based on the installed.json repository. This change ensures correct inclusion or exclusion of development dependencies, aligning Strauss's autoloader output more closely with Composer's behavior.
  • Enhanced Testing: A new integration test has been added to specifically verify that Strauss correctly processes dependencies when an alternative Composer configuration file is used. This test creates a scenario with multiple composer.json files and asserts that Strauss uses the one specified by the COMPOSER environment variable.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request implements support for custom composer.json files by respecting the COMPOSER environment variable. The changes are sound, and an integration test is included. The review suggests improvements to the test suite's robustness, including a fix for environment variable parsing, using PHPUnit assertions, and strengthening an assertion in the new test.

Comment on lines 111 to 116
fn(string $pair) => explode('=', $pair),
explode(' ', $env)
);
foreach ($envArray as $var) {
$_ENV[$var[0]] = $var[1];
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The current implementation for parsing environment variables is brittle and can lead to issues if $env is an empty string or if values contain an equals sign. explode('=', $pair) will split the value if it contains an equals sign. A more robust implementation is suggested.

        $envArray = array_map(
            fn(string $pair) => explode('=', $pair, 2),
            array_filter(explode(' ', $env))
        );
        foreach ($envArray as $var) {
            if (isset($var[1])) {
                $_ENV[$var[0]] = $var[1];
            }
        }


$env = 'COMPOSER=composer-free.json';
$exitCode = $this->runStrauss($output, '', $env);
assert(0 === $exitCode, $output);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Using assert() in tests is discouraged because its behavior depends on the zend.assertions PHP INI setting. If assertions are disabled, this check won't run. Using PHPUnit's assertion methods provides more reliable and consistent tests.

        $this->assertSame(0, $exitCode, $output);

assert(0 === $exitCode, $output);

$php_string = file_get_contents($this->testsWorkingDir . 'vendor-prefixed/composer/installed.json');
$this->assertStringContainsString("Saltus\\\\WP\\\\Plugin\\\\InteractiveGlobes\\\\Psr\\\\Log\\\\", $php_string);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

To enhance the test's robustness, add another assertion to verify that a dependency only present in the main composer.json (psr/container) was not processed. This would more strongly confirm that Strauss is using the correct configuration file.

        $this->assertStringContainsString("Saltus\\WP\\Plugin\\InteractiveGlobes\\Psr\\Log\\", $php_string);
        $this->assertStringNotContainsString("Saltus\\WP\\Plugin\\InteractiveGlobes\\Psr\\Container\\", $php_string);

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 8, 2025

strauss.phar.zip @ 94f7cf2 \n composer require brianhenryie/strauss:"dev-master#94f7cf2bbaf100f3cfa7adf4089e5bb88c0a575d" --dev

@BrianHenryIE BrianHenryIE merged commit 48e9abe into master Jul 15, 2025
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant