Skip to content

Use strtok3.parseBlob() #2460

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2025
Merged

Use strtok3.parseBlob() #2460

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 16, 2025

Conversation

Borewit
Copy link
Owner

@Borewit Borewit commented Jul 16, 2025

Instead of streaming Blob, uses Blob.slice().

@Borewit Borewit self-assigned this Jul 16, 2025
@Borewit Borewit added the improvement Improvement of existing functionality label Jul 16, 2025
@Borewit Borewit force-pushed the use-strtok3-parseBlob branch 2 times, most recently from e5cca03 to 7c34d18 Compare July 16, 2025 16:43
@Borewit
Use strtok3.parseBlob()
05d3ab8 
Instead of streaming Blob, uses `Blob.slice()`.
@Borewit Borewit force-pushed the use-strtok3-parseBlob branch from 7c34d18 to 05d3ab8 Compare July 16, 2025 22:24
@Borewit Borewit merged commit 3b688f1 into master Jul 16, 2025
30 checks passed
@Borewit Borewit deleted the use-strtok3-parseBlob branch July 16, 2025 22:26
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 97.057% (+0.05%) from 97.005%
when pulling 05d3ab8 on use-strtok3-parseBlob
into 8cede29 on master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Borewit Borewit

Labels
improvement Improvement of existing functionality
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Borewit @coveralls