Skip to content

fix(modeling): correct function context name for simple command aggregate #1809

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 31, 2025

Conversation

Ahoo-Wang
Copy link
Owner

  • Update function context name to use Wow.WOW instead of metadata contextName
  • This change ensures consistent naming for function context across the system

…gate

- Update function context name to use Wow.WOW instead of metadata contextName
- This change ensures consistent naming for function context across the system

Signed-off-by: Ahoo Wang <ahoowang@qq.com>
@Ahoo-Wang Ahoo-Wang added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 31, 2025
@Ahoo-Wang Ahoo-Wang merged commit 21b59bf into main Jul 31, 2025
13 of 15 checks passed
@Ahoo-Wang Ahoo-Wang deleted the SimpleCommandAggregate branch July 31, 2025 03:49
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 91.22%. Comparing base (c3cc500) to head (e61bdc6).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main    #1809   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     91.22%   91.22%           
  Complexity     3714     3714           
=========================================
  Files           701      701           
  Lines         12810    12810           
  Branches        812      812           
=========================================
  Hits          11686    11686           
  Misses          736      736           
  Partials        388      388           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.22% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant