Skip to content

Conversation

mqasimsarfraz
Copy link
Member

@mqasimsarfraz mqasimsarfraz commented Jul 29, 2025

Previously, the inspektor_gadget tool was placed behind a --addtional-tools flag because it registered multiple tools, which could affect user experience. Now that it has been consolidated into a single tool, we can enable it by default to provide a better user experience.

Additionally, this change renames the tool to inspektor_gadget_observability for improved clarity and consistency and included a better error message if IG needs to deployed.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 29, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 20.00000% with 8 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@aabb0e9). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/server/server.go 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
internal/components/inspektorgadget/handlers.go 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
internal/config/config.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #115   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   31.93%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       53           
  Lines           ?     5161           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1648           
  Misses          ?     3438           
  Partials        ?       75           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@feiskyer feiskyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a conflict on README, could you rebase and resolve it?

@mqasimsarfraz
Copy link
Member Author

There is a conflict on README, could you rebase and resolve it?

Thanks, Done!

Signed-off-by: Qasim Sarfraz <qasimsarfraz@microsoft.com>
Copy link
Member

@feiskyer feiskyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks addressing the comments, LGTM

@feiskyer feiskyer merged commit e87daad into Azure:main Jul 31, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants