-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
add new example for linearDynamicBeam + remove inclusion example and dxf file #466
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
linear dynamic beam example
excellent. thanks santiago. I proposed some first changes in #467 after that.. I propose to do other efficiency changes... so that it can be executed in octave... |
examples/linearDynamicCantilever/onsasExample_linearDynamicCantilever.m
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sugiero hacer los cambios de vectorización. también hacer la visualización en del script en la documentación y ver cómo queda la salida
renombro script y agrego a docs
Changed the analytic estimation for a vector estimation reducing the for's steps calculation from 3 to 1
Impecable Santiago. Tendrias que traerte lo nuevo del master a tu branch cliqueando en "update branch" . También creo que hay algunos detalles que arreglar en la documentación. |
Fixed documentation and checked the last update.
Updated dodcumentation to fix eqn problem.
…ONSAS.m into scorrea/linearDynamicBeam
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please delete .asv files
Deleted asv file and fixed small documentation errors.
@santiago-correa-89 i started to do some editions. you can merge my PR. however... I suggest you to upload the ../../assets/dynamicBeamHTML.svg file you are using in your script. |
Changed the error estimation to a vector process. Removed the for.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a few questions regarding the format Jorge. I saw that the distance between the variable and the equal is always the same under the section. I hear that should be only one space between the variable and the equal, which is the correct format?
in octave/matlab any option is valid octave:115> a=1, b = 2, c = 3
a = 1
b = 2
c = 3 as a convention I try to align the equals in the same block of code... to improve readability |
I just noticed a change in the error estimation. I was calculating the area under the error curve and comparing the norm of the area under the curve with the norm of the area of the analytic displacement. I think now the error estimation is a little bit different. |
Added example linear dynamic beam.
For this study case was tested a beam with two fixed nodes in each end and a time dependency sinusoidal load applied in the midd point with positive direction z and y. The analytic resolution was solved using the example 9.8 Vibración Forzada de una viga simplemente apoyada from the book Vibraciones Mecánicas Quinta Edición Singiresu S. Rao.
For this test was compared the analytic solution of the displacement of the beam with the numerical solution using the corotational formulation and the linear elastic formulation. To verify the solution was study the displacement in each direction of the node where the load is applied. To do this was study the difference between each numerical solution with the analytic solution.
Attached here is presented the time dependency of the displacement of the node in both directions.