Skip to content

nixos/clevis: fix luks support #382585

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ck3d
Copy link
Contributor

@ck3d ck3d commented Feb 16, 2025

Add missing packages when clevis is used for luks unlock It is not needed to expose all execuables via extraBin, therefor removed curl.

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

Add missing packages when clevis is used for luks unlock
It is not needed to expose all execuables via extraBin, therefor removed
curl.
@github-actions github-actions bot added 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. labels Feb 16, 2025
Comment on lines 82 to +87
copy_bin_and_libs ${pkgs.jose}/bin/jose
copy_bin_and_libs ${pkgs.curl}/bin/curl
copy_bin_and_libs ${pkgs.bash}/bin/bash
copy_bin_and_libs ${pkgs.cryptsetup}/bin/cryptsetup
copy_bin_and_libs ${pkgs.gnused}/bin/gnused
copy_bin_and_libs ${pkgs.gnugrep}/bin/gnugrep
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would recommend to sort those and the ones below

@SuperSandro2000
Copy link
Member

Can we somehow build a simple test for this?

@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Jun 9, 2025
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md label Aug 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch 2.status: stale https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/.github/STALE-BOT.md 6.topic: nixos Issues or PRs affecting NixOS modules, or package usability issues specific to NixOS 8.has: module (update) This PR changes an existing module in `nixos/` 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants