-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.6k
probe-rs-udev-rules: init at 0-unstable-2024-02-25 & picoprobe-udev-rules: remove/rename #373008
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Olivier 'reivilibre <git.contact@librepush.net>
Signed-off-by: Olivier 'reivilibre <git.contact@librepush.net>
Signed-off-by: Olivier 'reivilibre <git.contact@librepush.net>
Hi, I'm glad to hear that this package is being updated or improved, it was just a quick hack from my side, so I'm really glad it got an overhaul. I sadly haven't had much time for updating my packages and maintaining them, so I'm glad there's now a nice alternative. |
runHook postInstall | ||
''; | ||
|
||
meta = with lib; { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
meta = with lib; { | |
meta = { |
with lib; is outdate
|
||
src = fetchurl { | ||
url = "https://github.com/probe-rs/webpage/raw/c8dbcf00cef641117578aa3eccd26541b0e259f6/src/static/files/69-probe-rs.rules"; | ||
sha256 = "sha256-SdwESnOuvOKMsTvxyA5c4UwtcS3kU33SlNttepMm7HY="; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sha256 = "sha256-SdwESnOuvOKMsTvxyA5c4UwtcS3kU33SlNttepMm7HY="; | |
hash = "sha256-SdwESnOuvOKMsTvxyA5c4UwtcS3kU33SlNttepMm7HY="; |
use hash for sri hash
In this PR, I add a package with the
udev
rules forprobe-rs
, a tool for controlling USB debug probes from various vendors. Website: https://probe.rsSince an old version of these rules was actually already present in nixpkgs (unbeknownst to me when I started) under the name
picoprobe-udev-rules
, I decided to remove that and add a 'rename' alias so that any current users of the Pico are not broken.I'm not ultimately sure if this was the right thing to do, but it seemed better than having two packages with the same contents, or one with the wrong name.
cc. @MGlolenstine I don't know if you have thoughts on this or would want to be a maintainer of the package still? Since now it is no longer just aimed as specific to the Pico, it might be broader than what you intended to support as a package maintainer.
I am happy to do either way.
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.