Skip to content

Conversation

MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/F1bonacc1/process-compose/releases/tag/v1.73.0

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. labels Aug 11, 2025
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested a review from thenonameguy August 11, 2025 15:40
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages. labels Aug 11, 2025
@Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 432850
Commit: 1940bee134e19673de1103e140902e550d0a893d


x86_64-linux

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

@MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'll amend the commit later.

@MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 432850

Logs: https://github.com/MisileLab/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/16895309570


x86_64-linux

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

aarch64-linux

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

x86_64-darwin (sandbox = true)

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

aarch64-darwin (sandbox = true)

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

@Sigmanificient
Copy link
Member

 error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/apz095cscbdmdznargqr05l0q2g7pibs-source.drv':
         specified: sha256-fV0yuANSZyJlPGZ/nt5q9Bz6ps5bKM8gtLmNmfPMMoU=
            got:    sha256-oqScez+Ms01/TyGo3HmhtEgofIbpLqQtEyQH6kxVGrw=

Unreproducible package?

@MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor Author

 error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/apz095cscbdmdznargqr05l0q2g7pibs-source.drv':
         specified: sha256-fV0yuANSZyJlPGZ/nt5q9Bz6ps5bKM8gtLmNmfPMMoU=
            got:    sha256-oqScez+Ms01/TyGo3HmhtEgofIbpLqQtEyQH6kxVGrw=

Unreproducible package?

Maybe this? #8567

@drupol
Copy link
Contributor

drupol commented Aug 12, 2025

 error: hash mismatch in fixed-output derivation '/nix/store/apz095cscbdmdznargqr05l0q2g7pibs-source.drv':
         specified: sha256-fV0yuANSZyJlPGZ/nt5q9Bz6ps5bKM8gtLmNmfPMMoU=
            got:    sha256-oqScez+Ms01/TyGo3HmhtEgofIbpLqQtEyQH6kxVGrw=

Unreproducible package?

Maybe this? #8567

No, the .git directories are removed correctly

@MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 432850

Logs: https://github.com/MisileLab/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/16986385625


x86_64-linux

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

aarch64-linux

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

x86_64-darwin (sandbox = true)

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

aarch64-darwin (sandbox = true)

❌ 1 package failed to build:
  • process-compose

@sandydoo
Copy link
Contributor

There's always the backup plan 😉

proxyVendor = true;
vendorHash = "sha256-YfTDEdKHqw1e7JXv5gxo7OgNMhriaZo5+cnpzfbtfLk=";

@sandydoo
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, my bad, I thought this was yet another vendor hash issue.

FFIW, this builds on all 4 platforms with vendorHash = "sha256-fV0yuANSZyJlPGZ/nt5q9Bz6ps5bKM8gtLmNmfPMMoU=". I haven't encountered the source hash mismatch so far.

@domenkozar
Copy link
Member

Landed in cachix/devenv-nixpkgs@ba8785d, hope this gets merged soon.

@thenonameguy
Copy link
Contributor

thenonameguy commented Aug 22, 2025

@MisileLab thanks for the PR!
I will apply the above patch to a new branch over the weekend and get it merged as it's blocking a few of my projects.
Of course if you have time to apply it on this branch til then, that would be much preferred. :)

@MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 432850

Logs: https://github.com/MisileLab/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/17172731172


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • process-compose

aarch64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • process-compose

x86_64-darwin (sandbox = true)

✅ 1 package built:
  • process-compose

aarch64-darwin (sandbox = true)

✅ 1 package built:
  • process-compose

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Aug 25, 2025
@Sigmanificient Sigmanificient merged commit 0c6e9a6 into NixOS:master Aug 25, 2025
26 of 28 checks passed
@MisileLab MisileLab deleted the process_compose branch August 26, 2025 08:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-darwin: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. 12.approved-by: package-maintainer This PR was reviewed and approved by a maintainer listed in any of the changed packages.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants