nfs-ganesha: Build with Ceph and DBus support #432492
Conversation
|
Yeah, I noticed the ceph build breakage. I tested this by using the module from master on 25.05. Sorry, should have mentioned that. It turns out my project won't end up using nfs-ganesha after all, so I don't have a need for this functionality anymore. I'll still try to update the PR to make the ceph dependency optional when I have some free time. Thanks for taking the time to look at it. |
7c1b6d1 to
cdf3e9b
Compare
|
Turns out I do need nfs-ganesha after all :) I updated the Ceph changes to make them optional and also updated to build other Ceph features like the rados_ng recovery backend. Since I was working on this, I also made two unrelated changes - one is to bump the nfs-ganesha version to the new 7.0 release, and the other is to enable DBus (can be used for runtime management and to collect service metrics). I figured it would be easier to have all three in the same PR, but if you prefer I can open separate PRs for those. They are all self-contained in their own commits. The build patch for DBus is a bit ugly, but I just could not get cmake to pick up the DBus headers and libs through pkg-config. |
CephFS and RGW FSAL, storage of recovery info in RADOS objects, and RADOS URL support.
cdf3e9b to
14a187d
Compare
|
I pulled the v7.0 patch, I'll submit that as a separate PR. Sorry for the churn. |
|
Okay, the v7.0 patch is ready. Needed to upgrade ntirpc as well. I added it to this PR, but let me know if you prefer me to split them up. I also tested this on nixpkgs master, since the build failures seem to be fixed now. NFS serving works, no problems observed. |
b8b88b6 to
b5cfd98
Compare
This enables using the Ceph FSAL to serve files from CephFS. Also enable DBus.
Testing was done against nixpkgs-25.05 using callPackage due to breakage on unstable, but I don't think it matters here.
Things done
passthru.tests.nixpkgs-reviewon this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage../result/bin/.Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.