Skip to content

Conversation

trofi
Copy link
Contributor

@trofi trofi commented Jul 18, 2025

Changes:

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Nixpkgs 25.11 Release Notes (or backporting 25.05 Nixpkgs Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • NixOS 25.11 Release Notes (or backporting 25.05 NixOS Release notes)
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other contributing documentation in corresponding paths.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin-stdenv This PR causes stdenv to rebuild on Darwin and must target a staging branch. 10.rebuild-darwin: 5001+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and must target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 5001+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and must target the staging branches. labels Jul 18, 2025
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested review from np and JohnAZoidberg July 18, 2025 05:54
@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. and removed 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. labels Jul 18, 2025
@MisileLab
Copy link
Contributor

@trofi trofi changed the title sqlite: 3.50.2 -> 3.50.3 sqlite: 3.50.2 -> 3.50.4 Aug 7, 2025
@trofi
Copy link
Contributor Author

trofi commented Aug 7, 2025

https://sqlite.org/releaselog/3_50_4.html released

Good catch! Updated to 3.50.4.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5760

Copy link
Member

@martinetd martinetd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(gave up part way of nixpkgs-review given the scope of this PR, but looks good for staging, and sqlite3 itself and a couple of random dependent packages (util-linux-minimal, libseccomp, python3, systemd-minimal) build fine..)

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. label Aug 13, 2025
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5795

@philiptaron
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 426289 --package nixVersions.latest
Commit: f2205ad7de74c5b238226f1ce6eb9f9535b4d6c4


x86_64-linux

❌ 4 packages failed to build:
  • nixVersions.latest
  • nixVersions.latest.dev (nixVersions.latest.dev.dev, nixVersions.latest.dev.doc, nixVersions.latest.dev.man)
  • nixVersions.latest.doc (nixVersions.latest.doc.dev, nixVersions.latest.doc.doc, nixVersions.latest.doc.man)
  • nixVersions.latest.man (nixVersions.latest.man.dev, nixVersions.latest.man.doc, nixVersions.latest.man.man)

@trofi
Copy link
Contributor Author

trofi commented Aug 30, 2025

nixVersions.latest

Is it a bmake dependency failure by chance?

@philiptaron
Copy link
Contributor

Is it a bmake dependency failure by chance?

Likely, though I've lost my logs to find out. I did propose a fix for the test failure in that derivation in 269f0be, part of the Nix 2.31.0 PR.

@trofi
Copy link
Contributor Author

trofi commented Sep 1, 2025

Ah, nice! I think the correct test name is interrupt. interrupt-compat seems to be a subtest of it. It fails for me just as good on x86_64-linux (on tmpfs, on a real filesystem it usually succeeds). I think it's a flaky test: it tries to SIGINT make itself.

@philiptaron
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, nice! I think the correct test name is interrupt. interrupt-compat seems to be a subtest of it. It fails for me just as good on x86_64-linux (on tmpfs, on a real filesystem it usually succeeds). I think it's a flaky test: it tries to SIGINT make itself.

After reading the test code I think you're right. Let's turn it off.

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5824

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons. and removed 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. labels Sep 3, 2025
@philiptaron philiptaron merged commit 39842bc into NixOS:staging Sep 3, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
@trofi trofi deleted the sqlite-update branch September 3, 2025 21:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin: 5001+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Darwin and must target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-darwin-stdenv This PR causes stdenv to rebuild on Darwin and must target a staging branch. 10.rebuild-linux: 501+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and should normally target the staging branches. 10.rebuild-linux: 5001+ This PR causes many rebuilds on Linux and must target the staging branches. 12.approvals: 2 This PR was reviewed and approved by two persons.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants