-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16.6k
sqlite: 3.50.2 -> 3.50.4 #426289
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sqlite: 3.50.2 -> 3.50.4 #426289
Conversation
Good catch! Updated to |
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5760 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(gave up part way of nixpkgs-review given the scope of this PR, but looks good for staging, and sqlite3 itself and a couple of random dependent packages (util-linux-minimal, libseccomp, python3, systemd-minimal) build fine..)
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5795 |
|
Is it a |
Likely, though I've lost my logs to find out. I did propose a fix for the test failure in that derivation in 269f0be, part of the Nix 2.31.0 PR. |
Ah, nice! I think the correct test name is |
After reading the test code I think you're right. Let's turn it off. |
This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5824 |
Changes:
Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.